IMT – ORIGINS

IMT EVOLUTION

Interspatial Manifold Theory (IMT) was born
out of a drive to explain gravity, although
inspiration for the theory actually came from
looking at a different problem.
The theory evolved from a question I (and,
no doubt, everyone else) had regarding
the behavior of particles in the double slit
experiment. A question I was asking, as I
thought it might point to a more insightful
question, in relation to my interest in quantum
gravity.

Instead of question though, I was pointed in
the direction of an answer. IMT.
The inspiration that is; IMT, has evolved
rapidly through a number of unexpected
revelations that support the construct and
provided insight into fields I would never have
expected to find original understanding; had I
even dared venture there.

I have always believed that asking the right question is equally as important as having the right information.
I have always believed that asking the right question is equally as important as having the right information.

MATTER / ANTIMATTER

The basis of the theory revolves around
matter / antimatter symmetry.

Current theories struggle with the apparent
imbalance of matter/antimatter in the universe,
but I believe the fact that IMT restores the
balance, is not only our first step forward, but, a
step that continues to reinforce IMT as a viable
theory.

IMT proposes that antimatter is separated
from normal matter by an interspacial manifold.
To clarify, IMT proposes that antimatter exists
within the manifold.

This perception also gives rise to questions
regarding the boundaries of the manifold.
In this, IMT is proposing the manifold to be a
singular entity, as is our own matter space.
For the purpose of a frame of reference
in discussions throughout this theory, I am
suggesting a perception where the manifold
presents as a membrane between matter and
antimatter. This shouldn’t, however, occlude
the basic understanding that antimatter exists
within the manifold.

As we move forward you will see that the
membrane analogy provides a perceptual
framework that simplifies, but doesn’t
undermine, the construct of the theory.